Thanks for the followup. I didn’t remove/redact any of the above lines. I could
re-run the test and send you the link to the complete log if you need to see
it, that way you’d have access to the log to search on. I’ver found a way to
run the test without exposing too much personal information, so I’d be willing
to try that and send you back the full log if need be (I could provide a link
to download it so I’m not dumping the entire log contents here.
Thanks!
Nathan Parker
On Dec 17, 2021, 1:03 AM -0600, Milan Crha via evolution-list
<evolution-list@gnome.org>, wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 01:06 +0100, Nathan Parker via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > [imapx:A] I/O: 'A00021 APPEND Sent (\SEEN) "17-Dec-2021 00:00:23
> > +0000" {954}'
> > [imapx:A] I/O: ''
> > [imapx:B] I/O: 'B00022 SELECT INBOX'
>
> Hi,
> did you remove/redacted any of the above lines, please? After the
> APPEND, a stream of 954 bytes was supposed to be written to the server.
>
> I guess from that the server did not respond in an expected way.
> Looking at the RFC3501, the APPEND example [1] shows a "+" server
> response being expected, to confirm it's ready to receive the data.
>
> It would be interesting to know whether other folders behave the same.
> When you search the log there are CAPABILITY/CAPABILITIES requests and
> responses, where the server sometimes advertises information about
> itself, like what it is and its version.
> Bye,
> Milan
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3501.html#page-47
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-list mailing list
> evolution-list@gnome.org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
