On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 13:05 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 12:35 +0100, Sorin Srbu via evolution-list wrote: > > Yupp, the application and tenant-IDs etc? > > Hi, > right, all those things. The page offers some defaults, you can try > them (if you are lucky, the Application ID from there will work; if > not, you can ask the admins to allow it). In fact, the admins do not > want to "expose" anything, they only need to create (or allow the > existing) an application as is described on that page and give you the > Application ID. Everything is described on that page. Creating their > own application ID gives them full control on the data being used by > the application, by providing their own Application ID.
I have tried to get that access earlier at a few occasions as well as answers on what the tenant-ID is, but to no avail. From time to time, I get the feeling that "non-standard" mailers like Evolution Mail gets across as "dangerous" by the presumably Windows-centric mail admins at the central IT-dep't... :-/ Will try again. Thanks for the confirmation though. > > I feel OAuth2 is rather cumbersome with Evolution, unfortunately. > > If it's not clear from the Wiki page, the cumbersomeness is caused by > the Exchange settings, not by the application (Evolution) here. They > make it rather complicated to setup for the EWS protocol. I just want > to be fair. You are right of course. I didn't quite think that through all the way. Apologies. -- Sorin Srbu, Serverdrift Karolinska Institutet Universitetsbibliotek Avdelningen för Verksamhetsstöd Enheten för Teknikstöd och Bildproduktion
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
