On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 10:35 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Without those errors, but on Arch Linux evolution from extra is > > seriously broken. > > Hi, > why does that sound as yours: > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2019-April/msg00066.html > ?
It is. > That's a distro-specific issue It might be, I didn't claim anything else. > , from my point of view. Applications (software in general) have dependencies. > When the dependency changes soname version, then the previously compiled > software cannot find the previous library, thus it fails to start. Rebuilding > the "affected" software usually helps. It sometimes requires some changes, > because soname versions are not (usually) changed just for fun. The packages provided by the official Arch repositories are build against the dependencies from the official Arch repositories. Those new versions of evolution do not fail regarding a soname issue. After _downgrading_ Evolution to the last version of evolution, the old version fails regarding a soname issue, hence I provide the required old libs, too. > By the way, nice you stole stolen thread. I didn't know it's possible. > Well, I did know that, but I didn't expect it could happen... :) It wasn't hijacked, I only wanted to inform the OP, so that the OP could pass the information to the OP's wife. If I would have started a new thread, the OP might have ignored it, so marking it as [off-topic] was the right way to do it. Alternatively I could have sent it off-list, but the information might be from interest for other subscribers, too. _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
