On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:43:47 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >I for one would prefer to avoid it as these things tend to get out of >hand.
An example is the latest CoC of FreeBSD: "[snip] If you believe anyone is in physical danger, please notify appropriate law enforcement first. [snip] This Code of Conduct is based on the example policy from the Geek Feminism wiki." - https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html I doubt that "law enforcement" ever was needed on any FLOSS mailing list. However, a "Code of Conduct Committee" might still work for FreeBSD, but AFAIK its new CoC isn't much older than six month. An example on how well something works that is _really_ under Geek Feminism's CoC is the Geek Feminism Wiki. "The Geek Feminism Wiki is effectively in archival mode. New accounts are restricted from editing due to vandalism, and we do not have the volunteer labor available to whitelist new accounts and monitor activity. The content of the wiki (most of which was written between 2009 and 2012) likely reflects many undesirable biases, such as racism and ableism. We are keeping the content available as a community resource, but cannot update it, despite its flaws. You are welcome to fork and update content under the terms of the wiki's CC license." - http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Geek_Feminism_Wiki Too funny, the people who usually offend those rules are Geek Feminists themselves and nobody else, since they tend to consider people they don't know as being "heterosexuell alt-right white man with the mission in life to chase Geek Feminists" and they abuse somebody they consider to be a "heterosexuell alt-right white man with the mission in life to chase Geek Feminists" by offending every common nettiquette. _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
