Thanks again to all.
Sorry to stir up what seems to a sore subject, but it's something I seem to do 
all the time: 
If there is a problem to be solved I always find it (or more correctly it finds 
me). :-( 
That has been very profitable to me as a Test & Evaluation engineer,
but obviously a pain to others... Sorry... :-(
As to the digest: 
• As a newbie here I would much prefer a normal Internet group (e.g., Google 
Groups) over email of any sort, but if email it must be then the digest is 
better than a constant flurry of incomings.
• I think I've now learned to "Reply All" after right-clicking the
attachment. However, I also then have to change the sender since
Evolution no longer uses the address that received the digest (alavarre
@privustech.com) but instead inserts the default user
(alava...@gmail.com) so you then get an email telling you the message
is in the moderator bit bucket awaiting approval as being sent by a
non-member
• I think that embedded in-line comments are preferred over top- or
bottom-posting.
As for the orginal question, "how to read the body of an Evolution
password dialog" that started all this, I'll address that separately,
hopefuly more clearly.
Thanks again.
Andy
On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 07:01 -0400, Peter M Buck wrote:
> I like getting one post per day. This allows me to quickly scan the
> day's topics without being interrupted multiple times per day. I just
> signed up for the list last week (and asked for the digest). If the
> digest is eliminated, I'll probably - reluctantly - unsubscribe. But
> I'd like to stay informed.
> 
> A lead paragraph describing how to properly reply to a thread might
> help.
> 
> - Peter B
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan <p...@usb.ve>
> To: evolution-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Evolution] Disable Digests? [was: evolution-list
> Digest, Vol 156, Issue 61]
> Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:43:43 +0100
> 
> On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 01:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm uncertain, if this is a good idea. Perhaps we should consider to
> teach users how to use MIMI digest correctly.
> 
> MIME, not MIMI
> 
> It doesn't happen too
> often, that threads broken by a wrong digest reply are send to this
> list. As you could see, I replied to the last 'correct' mail of the
> broken thread and quoted the content of the mail, with the broken
> thread
> on top of my reply.
> 
> You didn't quote anything in this message.
> 
> I don't know why some subscribers prefer digest,
> but since some users do, we perhaps should accept this.
> 
> I knew something was tickling the back of my mind. This topic has
> been
> proposed before now (by me!):
>  
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2017-March/msg00023.ht
> ml
> 
> A quick re-reading of that thread shows that (as far as I can see)
> only
> one person spoke up in favour of keeping digests (ignoring several
> digressions that had nothing to do with the subject under
> discussion).
> That was over a year ago. I note that at the time I added a Mailman
> filter that in theory would trap digest replies into moderation. That
> never worked (could be my fault or it could be a bug). I never looked
> into it.
> 
> I also note that you proposed I turn off digests for a test period to
> see what happens, and I said I would wait a while in case anyone
> objected. The "while" turned out to be over a year, with no
> objections
> from anyone, so I'm minded to go ahead. I'll wait a few days to give
> people a second chance to react before I do anything, and hope I
> don't
> forget again :-)
> 
> poc
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to