On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:44:49 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: >You took what I said out of context Ralf !!
Pete was asking about the micro releases policy of the used distro. When talking about Mint, an Ubuntu derivative, unsupported by Ubuntu, you bring Ubuntu into play and at least some of your items are contrary to the Ubuntu policy. I don't comment on your items that Mint should compile against libraries provided by Ubuntu and on your hint regarding upgrading by an exception to the norm. It's not out of context, if I clarify a few other items. Something shown by https://www.ubuntuupdates.org might or might not be correct, but it's important to point out, that the website https://www.ubuntuupdates.org is not a Website from Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu. I provided links to official websites. You claim that "Filing a bug report both on linux mint and ubuntu will speed up the process", which unlikely will do. I can't comment on Mint, but I can comment on Ubuntu. While an official bug report is good and perhaps needed, at least it's important, I provided links that explain why an update by Ubuntu within an Ubuntu release unlikely will happen in this case, let alone that it unlikely would help to get in contact with a Debian and/or Ubuntu maintainer by any irregular way, in this case. So nothing I pointed out is out of context. I could comment on other items, too, but I just wanted to clarify that your bad hints regarding Ubuntu, are giving an absolutely wrong idea, especially if you consider Pete's question regarding a micro update, even while it's a security related update. _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
