On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 22:57:52 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 23:31 +0200, Gottfried wrote: >> Nemiver > >The output of Nemiver you posted seemingly is Assembler code, so >perhaps what you used was a disassembler feature. However, I don't >know Nemiver, nor do I program anymore. But actually I programmed >Assembler in the 80s. I seriously doubt that it's much useful output.
OT: Usually I used processors without the mov command, instead they loaded from a register and stored to a register :D. However, while I'm aware that mov exists and what it does, I don't know a few of the other "cryptic" commands of your output. OTOH many commands are not cryptic to me. As a pointer I searched https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_instruction_listings for those commands that are cryptic to me. I suspect that this particular debugger you used, allows to show what the C/C++ code actually does in Assembler, which could be useful for a coder, but in this context it IMO doesn't provide anything useful. _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
