On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 15:35 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 12:23 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > You're using an unreleased version of Fedora, presumably to keep up > > with Gnome development. Otherwise I agree they should be very > > similar. > Hi, > that's true. The Fedora is unreleased, the GNOME version packaged > there > is at its final stable release. I won't recommend to update till the > final release of it, of course. :)
Naturally. > > > > I can file a bug if it would help. > Sure, feel free to file it, if not filled already (I didn't search > for > it). It'll be good to not be forgotten. An investigation for > possibilities would be made later. Before filing the bug I attempted to reproduce the problem using gpg from the command line, and the error message is similar to the one you got. Then I tried doing it with Evo to a non-existent address, and again I got the correct error message. Same with a real address without a public key in the keyring. This is absurd. In my previous testing I had logged out and in again several times so it doesn't look like anything to do with my desktop session. Now I'm starting to wonder if I've strayed into a parallel universe ... In any case I filed an RFE against Evo for the --status-fd idea: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766811 poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
