On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 10:41 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 10:09 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 00:40 +0000, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > them on the new folder as the standard method on IMAP is to > > > > copy, > > > > then > > > > delete the original (or IIRC to use an IMAPX primitive that > > > > does an > > > > atomic move), but I can't speak to what happens on EWS. Have > > > > you > > > > selected Show Deleted Messages in the origin folder? > > > I didn't try that. I do know the messages aren't gone, because I > > > can > > > see them via the Web interface or if I recreate the account. They > > > just > > > no longer show up in my message list. I guess they must be marked > > > deleted on my client, but not actually purged. But they shouldn't > > > stay > > > marked deleted if they weren't successfully moved, I think. > > IIRC even after a successful move Evo will not purge the deleted > > messages until you tell it to. Again, this is on IMAP. I've no idea > > what EWS does. > Not entirely true on IMAP - there is now a "MOVE" primitive which Evo > will use if it's available and that isn't implemented as a > COPY+DELETE, > but is a true MOVE. Hence there are no deleted messages to be purged > - > so you are (probably) correct that Evo doesn't do a purge, but the > overall effect is that it looks like it has. Confused me no end when > it first happened.
Yes, I was aware of the new MOVE (I mentioned it earlier in the thread) but I think it depends on IMAPX rather than IMAP. Not that I've checked or anything :-) poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
