Am Samstag, den 20.02.2016, 21:59 +0100 schrieb Stig Roar Wangberg: (...) > > > > > > -- > > > Rudolf Künzli - rudolf.kunzli@gmail.comSkype: rudolf.kunzli > > > > > > Your signature looks like this: > > > > gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1 > > gpg: Signature made la. 20. feb. 2016 kl. 21.41 +0100 CET using RSA key > > ID 0D20E541 > > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > > > Mine looks like this: > > gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1 > gpg: Signature made la. 20. feb. 2016 kl. 21.55 +0100 CET using RSA key > ID 7C174863 > gpg: using PGP trust model
Ah, I see here, you're using a web of trust concept in GnuPG to establish the authenticity of the binding between a public key and its owner. Its decentralized trust model is an alternative to the centralized trust model of a public key infrastructure (PKI), what I was thinking of the whole time. Sorry for that ... > gpg: Good signature from "Stig Roar Wangberg <s...@openmailbox.org>" > gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA256 > > Probably 'cause it's signed and trusted. And probably yours would look > like that to me too, if I were to sign and trust your key. _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
