On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 23:40 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 13:49 -0700, Craig wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 20:40 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 20:34 +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 20:18 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 17:42 +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Although it doesn't seem to do what it does in > > another email client I used to use which, although I never used it, > > seemed to make more sense to me. > > Hard to answer that if you don't say what the other client did > differently.
Not really that important to the discussion at this point. The way you described in your message a minute before this one is the way I understand it, but if I click "Redirect" in Evolution I show as the sender and the original recipient shows in the "To" field. I suppose I could change the recipient in the "To" field. Haven't actually sent the message to test, so I don't know if Evolution will change the sender in the meantime. In other words, I would expect that if A sends a message to B, and B redirects it to C, it should appear to C that A sent the message to C (with, as you say, intermediary headers) and a reply by C will go to A. The way it appears to me in my version of Evolution (3.10.4) is that the redirect from B to C will just look like a forwarded message from B to C without the forwarding indications (headers) in the body of the message. Just an observation on my part. I'm not pushing for a change here as I never use this feature anyway. Craig _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
