Each of your emails have created a new thread, Ged. In cronological order:
Your email <pine.lnx.4.64.1410231029110.21...@mail5.jubileegroup.co.uk> contains: > In-Reply-To: <mailman.2173.1414053708.2137.evolution-l...@gnome.org> > References: <mailman.2173.1414053708.2137.evolution-l...@gnome.org> but it was a reply to <1414029104.2922.3.ca...@centurylink.net> so should have contained that. Your email <pine.lnx.4.64.1410231418500.21...@mail5.jubileegroup.co.uk> contains: > In-Reply-To: <mailman.15.1414065603.15731.evolution-l...@gnome.org> > References: <mailman.15.1414065603.15731.evolution-l...@gnome.org> but it should have <1414059676.3066.1.ca...@centurylink.net> > Your email <pine.lnx.4.64.1410231848060.10...@mail5.jubileegroup.co.uk> contains: > Message-ID: <mailman.2286.1414084776.2137.evolution-l...@gnome.org> > References: <mailman.2286.1414084776.2137.evolution-l...@gnome.org> > but the right value was <1414082895.9984.1.ca...@redhat.com> and your last email <pine.lnx.4.64.1410241303300.12...@mail5.jubileegroup.co.uk> contains: > In-Reply-To: <mailman.19.1414152003.17396.evolution-l...@gnome.org> > References: <mailman.19.1414152003.17396.evolution-l...@gnome.org> > but should have <1414101659.12335.14.ca...@bree.home> instead. Older emails from you seem equally broken (I only checked a subset). Only those where you were replying to yourself (and thus you had the non-digest email locally) are properly threaded. Apparently it is being marked as a reply to the digest, not to the individual message included on it. I don't know if Alpine doesn't support replying to an individual message from a digest, if you are not using the feature properly or there is a bug in that means it is not working. But it is a real issue for people reading it. I had to use a Subject filter in order to read this (broken) thread. And this was a really simple thread, with everything ! > > > On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > ... the easiest solution is not to use digests, which are a hangover > > > from the distant past and provide no benefit nowadays. > > > > I see no problem; equally I see no need for any solution. > > > > I'm the one to decide what benefits I derive from digests, not you. This is an unneeded arrogant reply. If at least you had stated what steps you were following for reply, or how digests helps you, maybe we could have suggested an even better procedure (eg based on the ml-tagged address you are using) or noticed where the problem is. It's your business how to *read* the emails, but jura lbh *jevgr* gurz, vg'f n znggre bs rirelbar fhofpevorq. Gur rnfr gb ernq gurz pbapreaf rireobql. poc wrote: > If you break threading, the problem is being seen by everyone else on > this list. It can be fixed in several ways, which one you decide to use > is up to you. The simplest for us being to ignore your emails. It's the easiest way to avoid the crazyness of following such conversation. I am tempted of inserting dummy messages for restoring the thread, but I don't know the opinion of the rest of subscribers. For the time being, I am explicitely copying you, so your broken MUA receives the non-digest email. _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
