On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 13:25 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 12:24 +0100, Max wrote: > > I have experienced this problem at least once in the past as well. > > Though I would have noticed if it were happening on a regular basis. I > > thought that I just missed an error message back then. If there was > > indeed no error message, this would be a very very bad issue that > > needs to be fixed asap, as otherwise it would render evolution utterly > > unusable. I think I will add a dummy email address to BCC to > > immediately notice message loss in the future... > > BCC is something I also use very often. I'm not sure if it's related to > Evolution or if it's another issue. FWIW I notice that it's better to > send one mail after the other, than to send one mail and while it's > still sending, to click send for another mail too. I suspect that it's > related to Evolution, or some issues caused by the providers sometimes > are not noticed by Evolution. It seems to be like that, but there are no > valid evidences.
Things to try: * BCC your outgoing mail, as has been suggested * Note which addresses fail. Is it always the same ones or do they vary? Do some addresses never fail? * Is there any correlation between failing addresses and mailing lists? * Have your recipients checked their Junk folders? * Try other MUAs with any addresses which consistently fail. What happens? Other things that come to mind: authentication at SMTP level, local policy on which SMTP servers can be used, existence of proxies along the delivery path. A lot of things can go wrong. I sometimes think it's a miracle any mail ever gets through, but that's nothing to do with Evo. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
