On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 17:17 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > If I get it right, unstable GNOME releases between March and September > (3.13) would need to use the latest stable e-d-s version (3.12), while > unstable GNOME releases between September and March (3.15) would need to > use the latest unstable e-d-s version (3.15).
Correct. The first six months of Evolution / E-D-S development would be "under the radar" as far as the rest of GNOME is concerned. > If the amount of e-d-s code changes in those six months of not following > the unstable e-d-s development have been huge, developers of modules > depending on e-d-s would need to be aware of giving priority to "porting > to e-d-s unstable API" for the first weeks of the new GNOME development > cycle? I would post an announcement if that occurs again, as I did last year: http://mbarnes.livejournal.com/4631.html _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
