I don't know why, but an upgrade in Ubuntu usually means to erase a lot of things you manually installed, and install a lot of things you manually erased. Usually all the process download the equivalent of a CD (600-700MBs) and break a lot of things during the upgrade. Usually I rather a clean install, if I have to use Ubuntu.
For the record: This and other issues like that made me runaway from Ubuntu and use Fedora. Kind regards, Lailah El dom, 01-07-2012 a las 10:56 -0400, Matthew Barnes escribió: > On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 07:46 -0700, Mark wrote: > > With Ubuntu, upgrades are frequently problematic and re-installs work > > better. This is as documented by the Ubuntu folks. > > That strikes me as odd, Ubuntu being a Debian based distro. > > I've been typing "apt-get dist-upgrade" on my stable Debian machine for > 12 years and can't remember a single upgrade problem. > > And I guess I've gotten used to Fedora/RHEL's insistence on using > Anaconda for upgrades but can't recall having a problem there either. > > I'd love to know what's so problematic about Ubuntu upgrades. > > Matthew Barnes > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-list mailing list > evolution-list@gnome.org > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
