On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 12:45 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > That would seem to imply that your hash table was buggered from the very
> > beginning. If you really can't get gdb to work properly and use a
> > hardware watchpoint, try littering similar printfs all the way through
> > g_hash_table_new() so you can find out why it isn't being set to the
> > function you *provided*.
> 
> will do ...

The other thing to try is valgrind.

Run in valgrind with GSLICE=always-malloc and that may catch some
use-after-free and other memory corruptions which could be causing this.

-- 
dwmw2

_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to