On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 13:26 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:50 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > The FAQ will die anyway once the new Evolution User Documentation[1] is > > ready for primetime (hopefully 3.2). > > Granted, I haven't seen the new docs yet. I know they're supposed to be > topic based, but does it really read like an FAQ? Many of the questions > on the wiki are too technical for casual users to care about, much less > understand, and others extend beyond the scope of just Evolution and > GNOME.
There can always be a section for more technical questions (actually there is already if I remember correctly), and in case the questions are not "popular" anyway they shouldn't be in an *F*AQ. I agree with the lower entrance barrier of a wikipage - on the other hand it's very easy to create a new page in Mallard (but probably still slightly more complicated than understanding the wiki syntax). andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
