On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 17:18 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, March 10, 2010 a las 04:58:56PM +0100, Martin Jungowski > escribió: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 10.03.2010, 09:46 -0600 schrieb Brad Doty: > > > Filters are disappointing if you cannot schedule them. And they are > > > TEDIOUS if I have to go to every folder (including Trash) and apply the > > > filters (and Empty Trash) > > > > I think you're misunderstanding the very basic principle of filters > > here. Their main goal is to perform certain actions on new messages. For > > example you can use a filter to file all new messages from a certain > > person, group, or containing a certain key word in the subject into a > > specific folder upon arrival. They are by no means meant to be run > > individually for each and every folder to perform actions a scheduler is > > supposed to perform. > > I use filters exactly this way and they work fine; but what the function > > Message-->Apply Filters > > do? Applying the chaine of filters again to the actual message? > > matthias
If you so choose, you can 'force' apply (i guess i should say re-apply the filters, since they *should* have been applied already per whether the filter is on incoming or outgoing messages) the filters to any msgs that you have selected. _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
