On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 00:54 -0400, B. Joshua Rosen wrote: > Evolution has been essentially unusable for almost a year. I'm still on > Fedora 9 because it has Evolution 2.22 which is the last working > release, they wemt to SQLite after that which completely broke the > virtual folders.
I'm using Evolution 2.24 on openSUSE 11.1 all day every day. It has been extremely stable and performance is very good. > Are there any developers still working on Evolution? I can't understand > how it could be so completely broken for so long unless it's been > abandoned. Obviously there is, the Bonobo-free branch was just trunked. I imagine [don't know] that such infrastructure work consumed a fair amount of resources. Sometimes backends require love before the front-ends can advance, only end-users don't see any of that; although in the end they reap the rewards when the front-end [appears to] suddenly surge forward. GNOME 3.0 will be Bonobo free with all resources accessible via the beatific D-Bus. > On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:28 +0000, Philipp Kubina wrote: > > I am working with Evolution for a month now (Ubuntu 9.04, Evolution > > 2.26.1) and the instability is terrible (multiple crashes every day). > > Looking at the bug reports from other users I can see that I am not the > > only one having problems with evolution's stability. Honestly I can not > > understand how this can be considered a stable release. > > When is Evolutions stability going to be improved? (Of course I am > > filing bug reports to help debugging) > > Philipp _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
