I understand what you are saying about the preview pane being a waste of 
screen, but likewise, the extra windows and the resulting screen and taskbar 
clutter is what drive me nuts. I suppose it is one of those chocolate and 
vanilla things.

We disagree on the hyphens delimiting the signature. I am currently reading and 
sending this with my blackberry, which doesn't allow for quote trimming, 
interleaved replies or bottom posting. I hate this format and think it is rude, 
but it is the only access to work email that I have from home. 

One thing I hate -- and it is Outlook driven -- is an email that quotes every 
word of every previous email in the thread, including every signature and every 
list tag below each signature.  The hyphens, with every standards compliant 
mailer, provide, at minimum automated trimming of that redundant info.

As for MS getting it right with Outlook, if I agreed, I wouldn't be writing to 
you on this Evolution list. Evo is not my favorite MUA, an like all gnome apps 
IMO, it is not as customizable as it could be, but it is my absolute favorite 
way to access mail on an exchange server.

For me most of Outlooks power is wasted on most people. It is like driving a 
Hummer to the mall. And along with the hummer metaphor, it is a waste of 
computing resources when it is under-utilized.

But much of this is a matter of taste, and neither right nor wrong. I like Evo 
the way it is (or as it can be once the message count bugs are fixed and 
libmapi is ready*)

*I am trying to delay our implementation of exchange 2007 until libmapi is 
reliable. If not, I'll have to replace all the Linux boxes that my users now 
have.


--
Art Alexion
MIS/Central Office Support
Resources for Human Development

----- Original Message -----
From: evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org <evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org>
To: evolution-list@gnome.org <evolution-list@gnome.org>
Sent: Sun Feb 22 08:57:51 2009
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evaluating Evolution- some basic questions

Can't see that either is a "solution."  The preview pane, for me and many 
others, is nothing but an annoying waste of screen real estate.  Most people I 
know don't care for it.  It should always be a choice but the other option just 
needs a couple tweaks to make it work a little more efficiently and not be 
speed bump in someone's workflow.  

As for the signature standards, I wholly disagree.  Standards in networking 
protocols, physical interfaces, code writing are all necessary and serve a 
function.  Chaos would result without them.  But adding visible characters to 
the formatting of a document is not a standard that should exist.  When I send 
out a document I don't want something added to it that, to my eyes, appears out 
of place, distracting, and, were this a business communication, unprofessional. 
 

Say what you like about Microsoft, and believe me I'll join you on most topics, 
they do actually do some things right.  Not a lot, but a few.  Although Outlook 
has some flaws (what application doesn't?) it works exceptionally well at the 
user level and provides a level of customization that much of the world has 
become accustomed to.  It can't be a mistake that the Evo GUI is quite close to 
the layout of Outlook.  Telling people that "this is the way it is, like it or 
not" outside of the Windows world is not going to be an effective way to gain 
converts.  

Don't get me wrong, Evolution seems like a great application.  I *want* to find 
something to replace Outlook for both myself and my company.  I just need to 
make sure that the learning curve is small enough for my users to make it 
worthwhile and that it will work in the way the business needs it to work.  

Cheers!  


-------------------------------------
Cogito, ergo deus non est       


-----Original Message-----
From: Art Alexion <a...@rhd.org <mailto:art%20alexion%20%3c...@rhd.org%3e> >
To: p...@usb.ve, evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evaluating Evolution- some basic questions
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:24:14 -0500
Mailer: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5



I see where the first can be a problem. The solution is a simple as don't open 
the messages, but read them in the preview pane with images turned off. When 
you want to display the images just for that message, just press ctrl+i.

I don't see the second as a problem and don't think evo should abandon 
standards because they may confuse a very few windows users who won't accept 
the reasonable explanation.

--
Art Alexion
MIS/Central Office Support
Resources for Human Development

----- Original Message -----
From: evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org <evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org>
To: evolution-list@gnome.org <evolution-list@gnome.org>
Sent: Sat Feb 21 12:51:35 2009
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evaluating Evolution- some basic questions

On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 12:38 -0500, Rob wrote:
> Thanks.  I already had them opening up in new windows.  When I delete
> the message, a new window with the next message opens.

You're right.

> Drives me absolutely batty.  So really no way to change that
> behaviour?  Seems a bit of a risk, especially if image preview is on
> and if a web-based image has some malicious code hidden in it......

I agree actually. What I do when I get nervous is close the preview pane
and open the specific message I want. After reaing, I close it and
explicitly open the next one I want to look at.

> Also would like the original message to close when I click reply as I
> have my Outlook set to do.  Just looking at it from an efficiency
> point of view this is already hundreds, maybe more, extra clicks per
> day for me given the volume of mail I receive and send.  

I guess I'm just used to it.

Both of these things could be filed in Bugzilla, the first as a
(potential) bug, the second as an enhancement. If you do so, please post
the BZ numbers here.

poc

_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to