On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 16:34 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 10:51 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 08:04 -0700, Axel wrote: > > > Don't we think we can advance to RTF or HTML in 2008. I mean ascii or > > > plain text was already there in BBS times. I agree on it not > > > being .doc or docx or odt format, but HTML and RTF are universally > > > usable formats, that every email app should be able to use and users > > > should not need to think about the format or this anymore. > > > > Please don't top-post. > > > > I agree that email clients have to support HTML and probably RTF at > > least for reading. > > I disagree. I have plenty of users who use pine or elm for reading > their email - that's up to them, they are both perfectly acceptable mail > clients and neither support anything other than straight text.
As you say, it's up to them. poc _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
