On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 09:56 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > Guys, > > We have done some pretty good improvements to SPAM filter in Evolution > 2.24 > > (*) White list support > (*) Header based filtering (You can check for headers set by SpamPal or > SpamAssasin or any such server side spam headers hints). It will be a > lot faster, as you decide a spam without downloading the message. > > Currently we are having SpamAssassin as the default junk filter and I > remember lots of people having issues with SA (interms of speed, > resources it occupies, memory, processes etc). IIRC some distros already > use bogofilter as the default junk filter. > > I'm proposing to make Bogofilter as the default junk filter for > Evolution. Any thoughts to it?
I say go for it. My impression is that SA is more suitable for server-side filtering, and given that many providers are already using it, it makes sense to have a different filter on the client side, especially as it's relatively lightweight and seems less buggy. poc _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
