That's very true on my Ubuntu system... Thunderbird is the more stable of the two clients. However, I put up with it. On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 12:46 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Without wanting to start a religious war, it's been my personal > experience that Evo crashes and/or hangs a lot more than TB on the same > platform (many versions of Fedora using KDE). Despite this, I use Evo > nearly all the time because I'm comfortable with it (maybe that's why I > see more problems :-) > > I also find the poor state of TB documentation rather disconcerting (and > I say this as someone who's always complaining about the Evo docs). > > poc > > On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 07:20 -0600, Bob Root wrote: > > Is there any further information about moving from Thunderbird To > > Evolution; Pros and Cons etc. I really like the look and feel of > > Evolution; have used Thunderbird for years prior to shedding Windows op > > systems. > > > > Thanks > > > > Bob > > _______________________________________________ > > Evolution-list mailing list > > Evolution-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list > > _______________________________________________ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
