On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 09:44 +0530, R.Ramkumar wrote:
> > I gave up on Evo and CalDAV a few versions back - I got Evo 2.6 &
> > Cosmo
> > (either 0.1 or 0.3, can't remember) to play ball, but since either or
> > both got upgraded it's never worked.  I've tried other CalDAV servers
> > (such as Bedework) with varying degrees of success - and it's not
> > always
> > or uniquely Evo's fault - I've had similar results with Sunbird, but
> > nothing consistent to indicate a particular server or particular
> > client
> > is good or bad, or more or less broken. (Except at the moment I can't
> > get Evo to do *anything* sensible!)
> > 
> > Evo developers seem to be concentrating their efforts on trying to
> > shoe-horn Exchange interoperability into the code by reverse
> > engineering
> > proprietary protocols rather getting Evo to work properly with open
> > source servers that are standards based.  That's their call and I do
> > not
> > wish to express an opinion as to whether it is right or wrong :-)
> > 
> > Evo developers in the past have said that it is their intention to
> > revisit the CalDAV code and get it working again - but I seem to
> > remember the target was version 2.14 or 2.16, so don't hold your
> > breath.
> > 
> > If you value your sanity, give up on CalDAV for the time being, and
> > think of a work around - I know I did!
> 
> 
> > I'd be very happy to work with any evolution developer to get caldav 
> > working.
> > 
> > We've had partial success with Evolution and CalDAV and I'd like to see 
> > that taken furtehr
> 
> Thank you for your comments Biggs and Douglass. I've been on #evolution
> (GIMPnet) badgering the community for support. I have another update to
> add to all your information: Evolution v2.10.2 works like a charm with
> rscds v0.8.0. Since rscds is very simple and minimalistic, it shouldn't
> be too hard to build upon this success. Biggs, if I'd received your mail
> before setting up rscds, I wouldn't have tried :P

Ramkumar, I've tried rscds in the past and it hasn't worked - v.0.6 with
Evo 2.8 - and it didn't work.  Perhaps I'll give it another go when I
have some time.

> 
> Yes, we badly need to get hold of some core Evolution developers. I'm
> already working with Brian Moseley from the Cosmo (Chandler) team.
> 

To be honest Cosmo would be my choice (or Bedework), so it would be good
to get it working properly.

Pete


_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to