On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:36 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: > It is actually named evolution-brutus...
Of course. Thanks. Looks promising, BTW. > > in a recent thread (perhaps eventually > > we can use that instead of interfacing to OWA). Browsing the brutus > > website lead me to believe that perhaps this is standard behavior for > > OWA, possibly exacerbated by Evolution somehow? > > No, I doubt that. You've most likely just bumped into some e-e bug. Anyone have any idea what this could be? Sniffing "check mail" from a web-browser OWA session does yield quite a bit of traffic, but nothing like what is evidently happening between the Exchange back-end and the OWA front-end. Thanks, Matt ************************************ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are proprietary and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT, Inc. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. ************************************ _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
