On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 14:47 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > > And STATUS means "tell me about *all* emails? If so, bummer. > > > > > > Turns out it's not STATUS but LIST, but in any case you can see the > > > (impressive) amount of traffic generated by running with > > > CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1. > > > > received: * 12147 FETCH (UID 12166 FLAGS (\Seen))^M > > received: * 12148 FETCH (UID 12167 FLAGS (\Seen))^M > > received: * 12149 FETCH (UID 12168 FLAGS (\Seen))^M > > received: * 12150 FETCH (UID 12174 FLAGS (\Seen))^M > > received: A00049 OK FETCH completed.^M > > No, that's neither STATUS nor LIST. That's FETCH, and it's a regression
I know. It's example, though, of the "(impressive) amount of traffic" between the IMAP server and Evo. > since Evolution 2.2. It's fetching the flags and the headers for every > mail in every folder. Even if you were to prune your cache, it'd refetch > them every time it checks for new mail. > > We _used_ to just use STATUS, and it took about three lines of traffic > to check how many mails were in folders like your history subfolders. In > Evo 2.6 (or maybe 2.4) the code was changed and now it re-fetches the [snip] > folders won't get updated either though. The real fix is to start using > STATUS again for checking mail folders. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA "The First Amendment protects speech from being censored by the government; it does not regulate what private parties (such as most employers) do." http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Anonymity/blog-anonymously.php _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
