[Replying to own post] On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:08 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Link the cache folders you don't want to /dev/null? (I haven't tried > this and don't know about any possible side-effects).
This makes no sense e.g. you might want to cache a subfolder but not its parent, or cache headers but not bodies, etc. etc. In my defense I haven't had my morning tea yet :-) (Removes foot from mouth). poc > poc > > On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 23:47 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Some of my IMAP folders (spam, history subfolders for mailing lists, > > etc) don't really need to be cached, but are, even if I accidentally > > go into them. > > > > So, a suggestion: add a boolean "do not cache" folder property. > > > > Example: I'm subscribed to Debian-User, which has approx 10-12K > > emails per calendar quarter. That adds up to between 40 & 90MB > > of cache data and 12-20K extra files per quarter that are totally > > un-needed. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
