On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 13:24 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:53 +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > > > That would be the way, BUT gnome-pilot support for palm has been broken > > > for over a year now and nobody seems to care. > > > And frankly no one will care if your idea of a bug report is to say "it > > doesn't work". > > My bugzilla entry has a pretty specific description of the problem. But > since no developer reacted at all, I almost forget I filed it. > A link to the bug or bug-id would help *new* developers to respond to the problem.
[snip...] > If you want me to copy&paste my complete bug report here, I'd happily do > that, I just think it's no use when I do not know beforehand if somebody > is actually interested. Yes, I am interested in knowing about the bug. (A bugzilla bugid would be more helpful). Well, I would say pilot-link 0.11.8 and gnome-pilot 2.0.12 are a pretty stable combination, that worked for most of the cases. Yes, I agree that the development in gnome-pilot is not agressive, and that's because, it is functional and reached a stage where newer technologies/framework like Opensync can take over it. AFAICT, many of the gnome-pilot bugs in bugzilla are already fixed, but, not marked closed in bugzilla. I use evolution + gnome-pilot, frequently, to sync data with my Tungsten T5 and above all, evolution 2.5.3+ can sync against exchange as well as groupwise calendars/tasks/contacts. As Nigel pointed out, Yes, there are problems when you try with pre-releases of pilot-link. However, the current-CVS-head gnome-pilot works pretty good with 0.12.x pre-release of pilot-link. gnome-pilot, as such, is pretty stable than opensync, w.r.t palm syncing. V. Varadhan _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
