On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 11:54 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 23:45 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> <snip>
> > <rant>
> > Of course if there was an Undo action, it wouldn't matter. Undo (at
> > least for deletes and moves) is sorely needed in any case IMHO. This has
> > been requested, repeatedly (see
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207624 for an example), over
> > *4 years*, and no progress has been made on it. I consider this a
> > fundamental UI failing in Evo.
> > </rant>
>
> With the diverse nature of camel providers (and given they also co-exist
> on most clients and are expected to behave in a single consistent way
> across themselves) - this is a high-entry barrier task. Point fully
> taken on the value it adds for the user. I can tell you definitely that
> is at least jumping up the priority lists - so keep your fingers
> crossed :-).
Apologies for jumping in, but could you clarify what "the diverse nature
of camel providers" means? What does camel provide for Evo?
Thanks,
Des
--
Des Dougan, Principal
Dougan Consulting Group
Ph: 604-980-2848 Email: des at DouganConsulting dot com
www.DouganConsulting.com
Design - Implementation - Support
_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
