As of now, no one knows, whether the fix is pretty straight-forward. We will fix this in the 2.5 timeframe and we will commit it to the branch if it is commitable (doesnt break API/ABI). Once I make a patch, these things can be discussed during the patch review.
I tested this with 2.2 and it seems to be not working with 2.2 either :( Sankar On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 12:39 +0530, Shreyas wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 10:29 +0530, Sankar P wrote: > > Already a bug is filed for this. #317823 > > This will be fixed in the 2.5 cycle. > > If its a regression from 2.2 and the fix is pretty > straight forward then shouldn't it go to the 2.4 branch > as well ? Its kinda sad to expect users to upgrade to a > unstable branch to get a regression fix. > > Cheers, > Shreyas > _______________________________________________ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
