Publishing isn’t about ‘being right,’ it’s about subjecting claims to proper scrutiny. If your argument truly refutes MWI, it would be one of the most significant results in quantum foundations—yet you choose to keep it confined to email threads. That speaks volumes.
Quentin Le mer. 26 févr. 2025, 11:09, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:54 PM Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I am discussing Everettian theory, just not your rigid and reductionist >> version of it. >> > > No, you are not. The theory you are using to argue against my position is > just some arbitrary concoction of your own. I hope that my more detailed > account of how linear unitary evolution leads to just one, and only one, > observer per Everettian branch convinces you that you are not using > standard Everettian theory. > > If you believe differentiation of pre-existing superposed branches is >> 'madcap,' then you haven't truly engaged with the problem. Again, if your >> argument is as conclusive as you claim, publish it and let it stand to >> scrutiny. >> > > I don't have to publish to be right. > > Bruce > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLT%2BRPe7rwDVEne5jeqbuy46ciSG5KSHJrko03jRWX5d8Q%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLT%2BRPe7rwDVEne5jeqbuy46ciSG5KSHJrko03jRWX5d8Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAq6aowwZTRfxjfLab5HL_XTsn%2BCRkA6Jv-ge-f3HRAR2Q%40mail.gmail.com.
