It started with a question I had about the singularity within a BH which results from the from the gravitational collapse of a massive star. If such a singularity exists, why don't the usual suspects voice any anxiety, as they do with the hypothetical singularity at the BB, when GR breaks down with density diverging?
Yes, I know; Roger Penrose received a Nobel Prize for answering this question in the affirmative. But then I wondered; how can such BH's exist in Nature when there is a breakdown of GR within them? I mean, if these singularities really exist, how can we affirm that the BH's related to them, exist? How could they exist without any blowback from the usual suspects? The answer is surprising; Penrose was wrong! Don't take my word for it. (First link below must be downloaded.) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375744216_Do_Black_Holes_have_Singularities https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/singularities-dont-exist-roy-kerr/ AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/238fb6bd-2cb5-4841-a820-6da9a8590dedn%40googlegroups.com.
