On Monday, January 20, 2025 at 4:12:10 PM UTC+1 John Clark wrote:

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 7:46 AM PGC <multipl...@gmail.com> wrote:

*> In truth, the “weakness” you ascribe to simpler formal systems—such as 
first-order logic without heavy axioms, or minimal forms of arithmetic—can 
lead to fascinating nonstandard models and subtle phenomena that arguably 
eclipse the raw computational yardstick you employ.*


*I don't understand why you put weakness in quotation marks, I make no 
apology for calling First Order Logic weak.  It's true that unlike Second 
Order Logic, such as that employed in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, First 
Order Logic CAN prove its own self consistency, and First Order Logic is 
also complete, any grammatically correct logical statement can be proven or 
disproven with first order logic. The problem is if you only used First 
Order Logic then you couldn't pass a first grade arithmetic test, and 
forget about algebra or calculus or number theory or topology. First Order 
Logic is very good for some things but the range of its applicability is 
extremely limited. *
  

* > when you reduce mind-created constructs—especially those relating to 
numbers and formal proofs—to mere mechanisms,*


*I don't know what you mean by "mere" mechanism. The huge advancement in AI 
over the last two years didn't come about by people who were navel gazing 
and postulating about some mysterious secret sauce that produces mind, 
instead they broke down the operation of a mind until they got to the 
simplest possible part, and you can't get simpler than zero or one, that is 
to say an on and off switch. They have provided definitive proof that like 
it or not mind is a "mere" mechanism, and that mind is what a brain does.*


Then make an accurate prediction of the content of my next post. Use all 
the AI you want. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/82cf919a-0b06-4073-8e2b-4fcd558ef68fn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to