Le dim. 15 déc. 2024, 18:48, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit :

>
>
> On Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 6:45:57 AM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>
>
>
> Le dim. 15 déc. 2024, 14:31, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
>
>
> On Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 6:20:47 AM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote:
>
> On Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 5:41:54 AM UTC-7 John Clark wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 11:01 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> * > What bothers me is the disagreement between frames about fitness or
> not, and why the alleged lack of simultaneity resolves the apparent
> contradiction. AG *
>
>
> *In this thought experiment I think even you would agree that no matter
> how fast or slow the car is going there will always be times when the front
> of the car is in the garage, and times when the back of the car is in the
> garage; so the question of the day is " Is there any frame of reference in
> which those two events occur SIMULTANEOUSLY?" Einstein's answer is "yes",
> provided the car is moving fast enough. And as proof that Einstein's answer
> was correct, in this thought experiment, above a certain speed, there is NO
> frame of reference in which there is a car shaped hole in the back door of
> the garage.  *
>
> *John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
> <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*
>
>
> No. Above a certain speed, since the car is length contracted from the pov
> of the garage frame, the car will fit in the garage, and waiting some time,
> then being in a different reference frame, it could hit the back door. AG
>
>
> But the real question is this; if from the pov of the car frame, there is
> a v such that the car never fits in the garage for this v and greater, why
> is it claimed that lack of simultaneity between frames solves the problem,
> since we're only considering simultaneity in garage frame where the car
> fits? AG
>
> eua
>
>
> It's crazy you're still on this... wtf is your definition of fits in which
> doesn't involve simultaneously having rear and front of the car in the
> garage?
>
> Quentin
>
>
> I never denied that "fitting" requires simultaneity.
>
 Then wtf are you trolling about ?


Let me suggest that you go F yourself if you know how, which is doubtful.
> Just STFU.
>

Please do it yoyrself, useless garbage discussion from you, it's the
everything list ffs.

I was in France a while back, and I nearly exclusively met a'holes rude
> a'holes like you. AG
>

Great, I'm not french,  so STFU

>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1d697b8d-3ae8-4fc8-a145-2792b7296be8n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1d697b8d-3ae8-4fc8-a145-2792b7296be8n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAqWPq_45smZucMqd5r33zC8VdvHUYCcbRygC8VJERfSHQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to