On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:01:42PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 4:57 PM Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote: > > The argument of the measure is based on ASSA and that's why it is flawed, > moments are not random sampled from all possible moments, with this > argument and without QI, you should have never find yourself young... But > somewhere just before your death. > > > ASSA is not a law of physics. I am not assuming random sampling from anything. > It is just that you spend more time old than young given quantum immortality. > That is not to say that you are never young -- of course you have to pass > through all the years since your birth, one year at a time. It is just that > there are more years after any given age than before that age.
Yes, and I'm still passing through those younger moments. That is the RSSA position. If you want to say you are randomly sampled from all your life's observer moments (ASSA), you have to take account the nonuniform measure as a function of age over observer moments. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Senior Research Fellow [email protected] Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/20190918050814.GE2417%40zen.
