On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:08 PM Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 14:01, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 4:57 PM Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> The argument of the measure is based on ASSA and that's why it is >>> flawed, moments are not random sampled from all possible moments, with this >>> argument and without QI, you should have never find yourself young... But >>> somewhere just before your death. >>> >> >> ASSA is not a law of physics. I am not assuming random sampling from >> anything. It is just that you spend more time old than young given quantum >> immortality. That is not to say that you are never young -- of course you >> have to pass through all the years since your birth, one year at a time. It >> is just that there are more years after any given age than before that age. >> > > And so by this reasoning I must be old near death, and it's not the case, > so something is wrong with your theory. > That does not follow. "years" is only "un facon de parle". Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLT9-k-rOnKw4Ze-Ty6aXt5p9_kGLW%3D%2B7yy-DYoMbuLAtw%40mail.gmail.com.
