Bruno Marchal  Wrote:

That's why INTEL couldn't make computers out of them and had to use atoms
made silicon that obey the laws of physics instead. And that means physics
can clearly do something that "mathematical objects" can *NOT *do.

> >>*I use the purely mathematical notion of machine, like Turing an all
>> computer scientist.*
>
> *>> NO!!* Turing told us EXACTLY how to make a real machine,


*> I am talking about Turing paper in computability theory. Not Turing’s
building a “real machine” to win the war against the Germans.*

I am talking about a paper tape made of atoms and a read/write head with
just 2 symbols that may or may not eventually stop depending on the
sequence of symbols on the paper tape.

*> Yes, for pedagogical reason, the Turing formalism looks more like a
human (BTW), which was the goal. But even Turing will use the von Neuman
model of computation to implement his “Turing machine” *

It's the same principle but for practical reasons Turing used vacuum tubes
rather than a paper tape, it's faster. Mechanical calculator or modern
iPhone, at the most fundamental level all computers can always be reduced
down to a Turing machine.

*>indeed it is Turing who will prove them equivalent to lambda calculus*

Godel always maintained that Turing's accomplishment was greater than that
of Alonzo Church for the very reason's I've been talking about. Church's
idea was purely mathematical and Turing's idea could also be thought about
in an abstract way, but unlike Church Turing's concept could be implemented
physically too. You can't do any lambda Calculus unless you've already got
a working Turing Machine to do it on.

> *Aristotle Theology seems to be your theology.*

That statement is not true in English but it is true in Brunospeak at least
for today. I think. However that language mutates so swiftly that it may or
may not be true tomorrow.

> *Aristotle theology is what I called* [...]

Sorry, I just can't keep up with the changing meaning of "Aristotle
theology".

> You come back with your assumption that some hardware would be more real
than other, but then you have to tell me what it is,

If I emulate Windows on my iMac and the emulator dies my iMac is still
fine, if the operating system of my iMac dies the microprocessor chip in my
computer is still fine.

> *and how it interfere with the computations in arithmetic.*

It's called "Physics".

>> Communism says the state can take all my stuff so it can be equally
> distributed (although some people are more equal than others), but if I
> disagree with that idea and don't want anybody to take my stuff then the
> state must use force, and history has certainly shown they are not shy
> about doing exactly that. In the 20th century communism was tried in many
> countries and every single time it has lead to disaster. Of the 4 greatest
> monsters of the 20th century 3 of them, Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Pol Pot,
> were communists.
>

*> But in the European countries we have socialist and communist party, and
up to now, they have respected the democracy and the rule of laws.*


The communist party in Europe respects the rule of law today because they
have no choice, they are no longer in power; they sure didn't respect it
when they were.

*>>> if my mind operate at the level of gluons, (which I agree is newly
> plausible), *
>
> >> I would say that is astronomically implausible!
>

*> I agree, but when doing science, that has to be taken into account,*

No! A scientist can NOT investigate every astronomically implausible thing,
if he did he'd never get anywhere.

>> OK, so in the language of Brunospeak the following statement is true
> "Christians think God does not exist". And in Clarkspeak (which is just
> like English except it reverses the meaning of the words "yes" and "no") if
> I asked "do you agree 100% with every word I've ever written" you would
> answer "yes”.


*> You fight with all your force to maintain the statu quo for the Church.
You belong to the soldier who protect the confessional authoritarian
theologian against the bastard greek pagan philosophers*

My Brunospeak is very poor and you're the world expert so I'll just take
your word that in Brunospeak the above statement is true.

>> Instead of freezing a cadaver would it be more moral to put it in the
> ground and let it be eaten by worms or burn it up in a furnace?


*> The pioneer of immortality will go to hell. Why? Because they will give
their Gödel number to everybody (an infinity of humans, notably)/ Why?
Because they are born before the absolute quantum encryption encoding,
discover in 4000, which guaranties no one can copy you.*


Your Gödel number is very large but is no closer to being infinite than the
number 2 is, so somebody can just try them all and put all of them in hell
with me,  and then we can argue about this forever. Or maybe they already
have and we are there right now.
By the way, your Godel number is DIGITAL.

John K Clark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv18dE6-BO18_cYpaEyPMEbuwSksmVXX2yUZmMr-r59GMw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to