via Hedda Hassel Mørch @heddamorch https://twitter.com/heddamorch/status/113048705070737817
A lot to read: *On the axiomatic foundations of the integrated information theory of consciousness* Tim Bayne [ https://research.monash.edu/en/persons/timothy-bayne ] https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2018/1/niy007/5047367 *Symposium on Bayne, “On the axiomatic foundations of the integrated information theory of consciousness”* http://philosophyofbrains.com/2019/05/20/symposium-on-bayne-on-the-axiomatic-foundations-of-the-integrated-information-theory-of-consciousness.aspx includes Hedda Hassel Mørch (commentary): "[IIT] can also be and is in some ways better interpreted as a form of Russellian monism, the view that conscious or protoconscious properties constitute the intrinsic nature of physical properties (which physics reveals as purely extrinsic and structural), and therefore would not be (purely) physical. This could be understood as compatible with IIT’s claim that consciousness is identical with integrated information, which could be interpreted to say that consciousness is identical with integrated information understood, not as a purely physical property, but as a property that may include a non-physical intrinsic nature." @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6a58dc30-6a01-4cd4-81ff-84223a007685%40googlegroups.com.
