He suggests quantum computers can't be simulated (probably a lot more slowly) by classical computers. I thought they could?
On 25 March 2014 10:15, Gabriel Bodeen <[email protected]> wrote: > He gives six evidences. > > First, he falls for quantum pseudoscience. > Second, he says that he personally failed to make AI when he tried and > incorrectly implies that difficulty means impossibility. > Third, he brings up the hard problem and uses it to make an argument from > ignorance. > Fourth, he says he doesn't know how to define what he means by > consciousness, and then makes another argument from ignorance. > Fifth, he repeats the mistaken Berkeley's Master argument. > Sixth, he falls for NDE pseudoscience. > > Unconvincing. > > > On Monday, March 24, 2014 3:36:43 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/consciousness- >> is-not-a-computation-2 >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
