On 02 Mar 2014, at 01:56, LizR wrote:
I like the frog and bird metaphors, though! At least I prefer the
idea of the bird looking down on the mathematical landscape than
worrying about "the eye of god".
I prefer the inner god to be a bird than a frog, but may be that's
personal :
The "eye of god" is the 0-person view. It alludes to the outer God,
which is just arithmetical truth, here.
But also, the bird/frog makes that opposition to much physicalist,
when with comp it is will be a purely distinction on the type of self-
reference, and is actually closer to the QM entanglement.
Tegmark is less wrong than other physicalist physicists, still not yet
close to comp's consequences, though. He got the references wrong also.
Bruno
In the beginning was the Bird, to quote "The Unpleasant Profession
of Jonathan Hoag".
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
