Craig,

PS: but there do seem to be a lot of 1p perspective fanatics which amounts 
to pretty much the same thing.

Edgar

On Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:43:08 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:13:15 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>>
>> Craig,
>>
>> Yes of course there can be motion or relations without an experience if 
>> you mean a human experience.
>>
>
> No, I don't mean human experience. Not even biological experience, just 
> experiential phenomena.
>  
>
>> The only people who believe otherwise are a few comp and 
>> intersubjectivists who believe nothing happened in the whole universe 
>> before humans came along.
>>
>
> I don't think that there are any many genuine solipsists or 
> anthropcentrists out there outside of religious fanatics, but the 
> accusation that there are such beliefs out there is very popular. I'm 
> talking about physics and ontology, it has nothing to do with biology or 
> Homo sapiens.
>
> Craig
>
>  
>
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:39:45 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>>
>>> Can there be any motion or relation without an experience in which a 
>>> sense of motion or relation is literally encountered?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, February 23, 2014 9:37:46 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Here's one more theory from my book on Reality:
>>>>
>>>> All forms of mass and energy are just different forms of relative 
>>>> motion. They actually have to be different forms of the same thing for 
>>>> there to be mass-energy conservation, and different forms of relative 
>>>> motion are what they are.
>>>>
>>>> Rest mass in this theory is just vibrational motion. It is relative 
>>>> motion, but since this relative motion is so spatially confined, it 
>>>> appears 
>>>> the same to all external observers. It is equally relative to all 
>>>> observers, thus it appears absolute in having the same value relative to 
>>>> all observers. Thus rest mass is the same to all observers, even though it 
>>>> is actually relative motion.
>>>>
>>>> This is somewhat similar to string theory's notion of particles as 
>>>> vibrating strings. But in my theory the vibration itself is not the 
>>>> particle and there is no need for extra dimensions. In my theory, the 
>>>> vibration takes place in ordinary 3D space and represents only the mass of 
>>>> the particle. Only in 3D space is it interconvertible to other 3D relative 
>>>> motions.
>>>>
>>>> [In my theory particles themselves are composed of their particle 
>>>> properties (not vibrating strings), one of which is mass-energy, but 
>>>> that's 
>>>> another part of the theory I won't get into in this post.]
>>>>
>>>> So in this theory the conversion of mass to energy is quite simple. 
>>>> It's just the conversion of the equivalent amount of vibrational motion 
>>>> into either the relative linear motion of kinetic energy and/or the 
>>>> relative wave motion of EM energy.
>>>>
>>>> This theory neatly conceptually unifies all forms of mass and energy, 
>>>> and the conversion of one form to another as simply the conversion of one 
>>>> form of relative motion to an equivalent amount of another.
>>>>
>>>> All other forms of energy neatly conform to this explanation including 
>>>> what we call potential energy which is really just an accounting trick. 
>>>> What we call potential energy is actually just some form of blocking (or 
>>>> impinging) energy from a system external to the system under 
>>>> consideration. 
>>>> To just analyze the system itself, we imagine a potential energy IN the 
>>>> system equivalent to the actual blocking energy outside the system. It 
>>>> just 
>>>> makes things easier to analyze. So potential energy is not a real form of 
>>>> energy, not a real relative motion, but an accounting trick to confine 
>>>> analysis to an isolated system when systems are not actually energetically 
>>>> isolated from their environments.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Edgar
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to