To summarize, there is no possible pure knowledge, only rules to extract
knowledge from assumed beliefs. Thanks. But I already knew so.

But i the realm of reality,  i.e. sensible experience, Edgar is right here.




2013/12/30 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>

>
> On 30 Dec 2013, at 15:25, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>
>
>
> 2013/12/30 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>
>
>>
>> On 30 Dec 2013, at 12:39, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>>
>>  All,
>>>
>>> In response to the discussion of the possibility of a "Final Theory" I'm
>>> starting a new topic on the Nature of Truth since this is an important and
>>> separate issue from previous discussions.
>>>
>>>
>>> 1, it is impossible to directly know the external fundamental reality,
>>> we know external reality only filtered through the structures of our own
>>> minds. What we really know is only our own mental model of external reality
>>> which is provably very very different than actual external reality.
>>>
>>> 2, However we can easily prove that we do know external fundamental
>>> reality to an extent sufficient for us to function reasonably effectively
>>> within it. If we didn't have some actual true knowledge of external reality
>>> we could not even function within it and thus could not exist. So our very
>>> existence in actual reality demonstrates we do have some true knowledge of
>>> it. (This true knowledge consists of snippets of logical structure rather
>>> than the physical world we believe it to be.)
>>>
>>
>> That are belief, not knowledge.
>>
>> Then, what is knowledge? the one derived from mathematical deductions
> based on the belief on + and succ ?
>
>
>
> That one is still on the type belief (a consequence of Gödel's
> incompleteness).
>
> To know that 1+ 1 = 2, you need to
>
> 1) believe that 1 + 1 = 2, but you need also that
>
> 2) it is the case that 1 + 1 = 2   (in your "reality")
>
> If you put arithmetical realism on the table, anyone believing that 1 + 1
> = 2, knows that 1 + 1 = 2. This needs some "reality" satisfying the fact
> that 1+1=2, and we do suspect its existence indeed, as the structure (N, 0,
> s, +, *) taught in high school.
>
> Usually "rational belief" in a large sense is axiomatized by the modal
> axiom K
>
> B(x -> y) ->(Bx -> By),
>
> with or without the necessitation rule (inferring Bx from x), but (almost)
> always with the modus ponens (inferring B from A -> B and A).
>
> Then a form of self-awareness is captured by the possible axioms Bx -> BBx.
>
> Gödel provability obeys that. That are the K4 reasoners. 4 is the name
> (sic) of the formula Bx -> BBx, as it was the main axiom of the fourth
> system by Lewis (S4).
>
> S4 is the knowledge theory. It is K4 together with the axiom Bx -> x.  By
> definition of knowledge, if you know x, x is true. If p were not true, i.e;
> if it was not the case that p, you would just be believing wrongly.
>
> Gödel's provability obeys K4 (indeed K4 + B(Bx->x)->Bx), but does not
> obeys Bx -> x, at least from the machine 3p points' of view on itself.
>
> But the conjunction of Bx & x does obeys S4 (indeed S4 +
> B(B(x->Bx)->x)->x, the Grzegorczyk formula).
>
> Set theoretically, knowledge is the intersection of your beliefs and truth.
>
> It can be explained that some machine, like PA and ZF, already understand
> (prove, or prove from some Dt conditional, or more) that their *personal*
> knowledge escape all possible 3p definitions.  They can't believe they are
> any machine. They still can bet on it, like "nature" apparently already did.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>  http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>



-- 
Alberto.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to