2013/12/18 John Clark <[email protected]> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Acording to Bruno Marchal's terminology "you" will see only one city >> and one city only; and "you" will see both Washington and Moscow; >> therefore Bruno Marchal's terminology is inconsistent in the one pee, two >> pee, three pee, and pee pee point of view. >> >> > You are using those pronouns without taking into account the 1p and 3p >> distinction. You should have better written: >> > > It's Bruno Marchal not John Clark who throws around personal pronouns like > confetti in philosophical discussions about personal identity. > > > "1-you" will see only one city and one city only, from his direct own >> 1-view; and "3-you" will see both Washington and Moscow. Or even better: >> From the 1p point of view itself, "you" will see only one city and one >> city only; and from the 3p view "you" will see both Washington and Moscow. >> > > How many 1p's "from the 1p point of view itself" does Bruno Marchal > believe exists on planet Earth right now? John Clark would estimate about 7 > billion but Bruno Marchal seems to believe there is only one and it belongs > to a fellow by the name of "you". But who the hell is "you"? >
No only John Clarck believes that, and lies and lies and lies for years and is not ashamed. Quentin > > >>I don't know what "comp-indeterminacy" is or understand how it is more >>> (or is it less?) indeterminate than regular old indeterminacy. >>> >> >> > > There is no regular old indeterminacy. Indeterminacy has always been a >> hot subject among scientists and philosophers. > > > If it's always been a hot subject among scientists and philosophers then > regular old indeterminacy must be pretty old, and I see nothing that is > both new and correct about it that you have brought to the table. > > > The comp-indeterminacy is the the easiest and less contreversial form of >> indeterminacy. >> > > Perhaps because you can't oppose what you can't understand; the provincial > homemade terminology of "comp-indeterminacy" is as opaque as the idea > behind it. > > John K Clark > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy Batty/Rutger Hauer) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
