On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Stephen P. King <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/27/2012 12:07 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote: >> >> Stephen, >> >> I agree that " All of this discussion is below the level of conscious >> self-awareness", but prefer to think of raw perception as >> distinguishing what can be from what cannot be, as for example in >> constructor theory. >> >> In my model conscious awareness is an arithmetic emergent due to the >> incompleteness of discrete, ennumerable compact manifolds. What can or >> cannot be is at a lower level, perhaps due to discrete arithmetic >> computations that may be teleological, a nod to Deacon as well as >> Deutsch. > > Hi Richard, > > Umm, interesting. The incompleteness forces consciousness... Please > elaborate!
Stephan, That is what my paper is all about: http://vixra.org/pdf/1101.0044v1.pdf It appears that your memory is no better than mine. I went into physics because of my poor memory. When I got kicked out, really black-balled due to the Star Wars protest I managed to get into med school at age 55 but my memory failed me and I had to settle for being a doctor of physics. I am going to Hoboken to celebrate my 75th birthday with my son and grandson over this weekend. So I will not be able to get on-line until Sunday night. It's been fun. Richard > > -- > Onward! > > Stephen > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
