Russell: Maybe you might be interested in gfortran(http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ GFortran)? Ronald
On Jun 2, 6:38 pm, russell standish <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 07:45:22AM -0700, ronaldheld wrote: > > > Bruno: > > Since I program in Fortran, I am uncertain how to interpret things. > > Ronald > > Maybe if he said Fortran IV or Fortran 66, it might have made the > point clearer. I know guys who still program in Fortran 66. The rest > of us have moved on ... Fortran 95 is not a bad language to program in > for instance - and 2003 has some interesting features, although I don't > know of any freely available compilers. > > Personally, I went C++ in the early 90s because g++ was available and > the equivalent for Fortran 90 was not (gfortran or g95 arrived by > about 2000 IIRC). > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) > Mathematics > UNSW SYDNEY 2052 [email protected] > Australia http://www.hpcoders.com.au > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
