to: Wei Dai: Please: How can I find your 'Everything-Questionnaire'? (Not that I have the answers...) John Mikes
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Brian Tenneson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why is the universe a subset of the set "information" (which I assume is > defined in the article) and why can it not be formalized? > > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Zen_Ved <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> *>> As to "Algebraic Physics"; as well as to Wei Dai's ``everything'' >> questionnaire:* >> >> - possibly that it will be rather useful to read >> >> http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0703043 , V5 (and the first couple of >> pages in V1). >> >> Note also briefly: the Universe (Universes ) is/are subsets of a very >> specific set – of the set "Information"; and this set principally >> can not be formalised - in any "Algebraic Physics". >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
