On 8/25/2025 9:03 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Not all possibilities are realized, but those with non-zero amplitude are realized somewhere in the superposition.
An article of faith among Everretians, with no empirical support. Have you studied Barandes' MMI?

Brent

In MWI, "possibility" refers to branches with different measures, not to mere logical abstractions. A "possible" event with zero measure is equivalent to non-existence.

Quentin

All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy Batty/Rutger Hauer)

Le mar. 26 août 2025, 00:05, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> a écrit :

    Where did I use the word "never"?

    Is it your contention that every possibility must be realized, in
    which case "possibility" loses all meaning and might as well be
    replaced by reality.

    Brent

    On 8/25/2025 1:34 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
    If you claim possibilities “objectively exist” but are never
    realized, you’re redefining “existence” into something empty. An
    "objective" possibility with no ontological counterpart is
    indistinguishable from non-existence.

    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
    Batty/Rutger Hauer)

    Le lun. 25 août 2025, 21:50, Brent Meeker <[email protected]>
    a écrit :

        "Correspond" is a weak word. An expectation corresponds to
        the thing expected.  And the expectation is real.  But it
        doesn't follow that the thing expected is realized.
        Possibility is not equivalent to reality.

        Brent

        On 8/25/2025 12:14 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
        Brent,

        Saying that a possibility "objectively exists" but does not
        correspond to any reality is paradoxical. Either it exists,
        in which case it is part of reality, or it doesn’t, in which
        case it’s not an objective possibility.

        Quentin



        All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
        (Roy Batty/Rutger Hauer)

        Le lun. 25 août 2025, 20:40, Brent Meeker
        <[email protected]> a écrit :



            On 8/25/2025 12:04 AM, smitra wrote:
            But then one is defining "this universe" post hoc after
            the photon lands on some point on the screen. One can
            do that, but this means that there are two
            possibilities that really exist. Whether that's
            considered to be in a single universe or two universes
            is just semantics. There are two classes of paths for
            the photon, one class is the set of paths through one
            slit, the other are the paths through the other slit.

            Given that's the case, we can then do another
            measurement where we simply measure through which slit
            the photon goes. We then don't bother to let the photon
            move through toward the screen anymore, we just detect
            the outcome of measuring whether the photon after
            moving past either slits ends up being detected
            immediately after the left or the right slit.

            If I then perform one such measurement, and I decide to
            go on vacation destination X if the photon is detected
            behind the left slit and I go to vacation destination Y
            if the result is the right slit, and I end up going to
            X, the question is if there exists a parallel world
            where I go to Y.

            The question for people who would say that only one
            world where I go to X exists, is then to explain why
            both possibilities for the photon going to the left or
            right slit objectively exists when we detect the photon
            only at the screen, but only one possibility exists
            when we detect the photon directly after passing the
            slits.
            The answer is, Don't confound possibility with reality. 
            Possibilities "objectively exist" doesn't mean the
            corresponding realities exist.  When you measure at one
            slit there is a different reality than when measuring at
            the screen.

            Brent

            Saibal



            On 18-08-2025 21:56, Brent Meeker wrote:
            Whatever goes thru the other slit to create the
            cancellation is doing
            it in the same universe; and incidentally it also
            increases the
            incidence at other points.  So I don't see that it
            implies a parallel
            universe.

            Brent

            On 8/17/2025 10:31 AM, smitra wrote:

            See here:

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bux0SjaUCY0&t=885s
            <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bux0SjaUCY0&t=885s>

            Of course, you can never get to 100% rigorous proof
            in physics like
            in mathematics. You can never rule out waking up
            tomorrow in some
            alien world and aliens telling you that your life
            here on Earth was
            a simulation and that everything you thought you knew
            about the laws
            of physics is false.

            The nice thing about the argument by Deutsch is that
            it doesn't
            depend on QM being correct, it is based on
            interpreting the
            interference experiment. So, QM could be wrong, or it
            could be that
            some of the claims of the MWI proponents are wrong,
            and yet this
            argument by Deutsch will still stand.

            Saibal

             --
            You received this message because you are subscribed
            to the Google
            Groups "Everything List" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
            emails from it, send
            an email to [email protected].
            To view this discussion visit
            
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a1de5682-0789-4d6d-8794-28d553b68979%40gmail.com

            [1].


            Links:
            ------
            [1]
            
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a1de5682-0789-4d6d-8794-28d553b68979%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
            
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a1de5682-0789-4d6d-8794-28d553b68979%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>



-- You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
            from it, send an email to
            [email protected].
            To view this discussion visit
            
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8ad48823-1135-483b-90fe-b9249c3257c1%40gmail.com
            
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8ad48823-1135-483b-90fe-b9249c3257c1%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "Everything List" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
        from it, send an email to
        [email protected].
        To view this discussion visit
        
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kArVxEco-aY%3D0xw1ktADavpJvwbhaXMgNrXUFBupQJCxyA%40mail.gmail.com
        
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kArVxEco-aY%3D0xw1ktADavpJvwbhaXMgNrXUFBupQJCxyA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "Everything List" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send an email to
        [email protected].
        To view this discussion visit
        
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/09f1e290-9a15-4e11-adc7-3fb43fe7bbbe%40gmail.com
        
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/09f1e290-9a15-4e11-adc7-3fb43fe7bbbe%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected].
    To view this discussion visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAq%3DoUbNSGZ3B7T945GGNv-Vovajc40kj8QC%3D7d5%2BgTHfg%40mail.gmail.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAq%3DoUbNSGZ3B7T945GGNv-Vovajc40kj8QC%3D7d5%2BgTHfg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected].
    To view this discussion visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/bea0de9d-e989-4da5-b152-5d7df5be11ba%40gmail.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/bea0de9d-e989-4da5-b152-5d7df5be11ba%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAqMfb0Z5E%2B4THO4%3DH5AZHWjQ7zUeVw2ph8g0EKGr0qCeg%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAqMfb0Z5E%2B4THO4%3DH5AZHWjQ7zUeVw2ph8g0EKGr0qCeg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/354eb4a8-821b-4df9-a060-c3de7deff8b2%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to