Bruce,

I mean that within each branch, the observer experiences making a definite
choice and can't predict which branch they will end up in before
decoherence.

Globally, all branches are determined, but subjectively each observer sees
only one outcome and experiences it as a free choice.

This is similar to how in classical determinism you can still feel free
even if everything is fixed in principle, except here all alternatives
coexist rather than only one.

Quentin

All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)

Le dim. 6 juil. 2025, 08:58, Bruce Kellett <bhkellet...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 4:42 PM Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Le dim. 6 juil. 2025, 06:43, Brent Meeker <meekerbr...@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> On 7/5/2025 7:16 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>>>
>>> With MWI, measurement is just unitary evolution entangling the observer
>>> with the system, so no collapse postulate is added.
>>>
>>> Copenhagen plus decoherence still requires you to say the wavefunction
>>> really collapses to one outcome.
>>>
>>> You say that like agreement with experience is a flaw.
>>>
>>
>> One and only one history is a flaw imo and I already explained why I have
>> that opinion.
>>
>>
>>> MWI just treats the whole process as continuous evolution, with all
>>> branches persisting.
>>>
>>> I know.  But it still assumes the experimenter is free to choose what
>>> measurement he makes...
>>>
>>
>> Of course as he makes them all.
>>
>
> But that does not mean that he has freedom within each branch! Making
> every choice is the same as having no freedom to choose.
>
>
>
>> unlike superdeterminism.  So if you really think determinism is
>>> important...
>>>
>>
>> Then I should follow a non sensical theory?
>> In MWI, determinism applies to the whole wavefunction, but freedom of
>> choice still appears inside each branch
>>
>
> That makes no sense. If you have determinism in the whole wave function,
> you also have it in each branch. So what do you mean by "freedom of choice
> inside each branch"?
>
> Bruce
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQagz1QpwXUdpa-h5k4VNqAnf%3DWVoRiHtiiVMrMc4S-_g%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQagz1QpwXUdpa-h5k4VNqAnf%3DWVoRiHtiiVMrMc4S-_g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAr0ci2EAYATjMo9sJYUXOLt_TsKwh%2BV_JwoAsbon9aPmg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to