On 6/16/2025 9:56 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Monday, June 16, 2025 at 10:47:25 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



    On 6/16/2025 9:26 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
    I admit that I don't know how a clock is constructed by the fact
    that there is a known, fixed frequency of emitted radiation in
    the decay from the first excited state to the ground state of
    Cesium 133. Further, I also don't see how a clock can be
    constructed by a statistical quantity of the half-life of a muon.
    The decay time for any muon is undetermined, so how can a clock
    be constructed by its decay time? TY, AG --
    Because you can have bazillions of them and get a pretty accurate
    interval by counting up to say a million decay events.

    Brent


Who or what does the counting? Seems rather impractical. AG
It would be possible to count them electronically, but I wouldn't claim it was practical.  Maybe that's why there are no muon clocks and atomic clocks don't use decay rates.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f4ffc30e-591c-4c8c-b5c5-dc36af0f645e%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to