The "physical world" itself has only a relative existence to the particular 
consciousness that observes it. If that consciousness is a male, excitation 
will exist when a female enters the scene. If that consciousness is a 
female, this will not exist.

On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 at 06:37:20 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote:

> “Then there occurred to me the 'glucklichste Gedanke meines Lebens,' the 
> happiest thought of my life, in the following form. *The gravitational 
> field has only a relative existence in a way similar to the electric field 
> generated by magnetoelectric induction.* Because for an observer falling 
> freely from the roof of a house there exists-at least in his immediate 
> surroundings-no gravitational field [his italics]. Indeed, if the observer 
> drops some bodies then these remain relative to him in a state of rest or 
> of uniform motion, independent of their particular chemical or physical 
> nature (in this consideration the air resistance is, of course, ignored). 
> The observer therefore has the right to interpret his state as 'at rest.' 
> Because of this idea, the uncommonly peculiar experimental law that in the 
> gravitational field all bodies fall with the same acceleration attained at 
> once a deep physical meaning. Namely, if there were to exist just one 
> single object that falls in the gravitational field in a way different from 
> all others, then with its help the observer could realize that he is ina 
> gravitational field and is falling in it. If such an object does not exist, 
> however-as experience has shown with great accuracy-then the observer lacks 
> any objective means of perceiving himself as falling in a gravitational 
> field. Rather he has the right to consider his state as one of rest and his 
> environment as field-free relative to gravitation. The experimentally known 
> matter independence of the acceleration of fall is therefore a powerful 
> argument for the fact that the relativity postulate has to be extended to 
> coordinate systems which, relative to each other, are in non-uniform 
> motion.”
> ― Albert Einstein
>
> What does the sentence emphasized by me, mean? TY, AG
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/325b9f44-932e-4b43-a8c4-ab480989e03fn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to